The accelerator dilemma

Accelerators have become an amazing asset for the tech ecosystem. For start-up founders, however, picking an accelerator is like deciding to go to grad school. First you have to decide if its right for you, and then make sure you’ve picked to the right one. Just like grad school, attendance is not a guaranteed ticket to success. 

At Founder Collective we have invested in some really exciting companies that have gone through these programs. SeatGeek (DreamIt) and Contently (TechStars) are great examples. I expect us to continue to invest in accelerator graduates.

That said, prospective companies should be aware of the realities facing accelerator companies and how to maximize their likelihood for success. These include:

Investor fatigue

Recently, I’ve noticed fewer and fewer investors in attendance at Demo Days. Personally, I’ve found it difficult to attend many of them due to conflicts and the long time commitment (usually most of a day). Instead, I swing by the accelerator during the class “semester” to give a talk or hold office hours. I’ve heard some investors say they’re not stopping by a given accelerator, instead hoping to hear about buzzy companies through their network. Start-ups seeking capital should work pre-demo day to warm investors to the team and opportunity.

Challenging mentor recruitment

It’s getting harder for companies to sign-up great investor mentors. Investor fatigue is one reason, but also many investors have never invested in a company they’ve mentored. In the early days of TechStars, I mentored one company per class (e.g. StepOut and ThinkNear). These days I tell accelerator companies that I’m available to help out, but won’t mentor a single company. Industry or entrepreneur mentors are generally more valuable for companies at the early stage and thus, start-ups should focus their recruitment there.

Post Demo Day Thaw

Companies underestimate the pressure to raise capital before or immediately after Demo Day. There’s about a 60-day halo. Once the halo is gone, investors grow weary of companies that haven’t raised capital. There’s a negative signal that forms if a company is more than two months from a given Demo Day and has not secured capital. Early conversations with investors represent one hedge against this. More importantly, before applying to an accelerator founders should think hard about whether they expect to accomplish the requisite milestones during class to secure funding.

A positive sign for accelerator graduates

A growing number of investors are revisiting companies two or three classes removed from graduation.  Investors (and hopefully accelerator organizers) have realized that not all companies mature at the same pace. Some of the real gems, in fact, may have been out of the accelerator for a year or two. So, even for companies that don’t get funded right out of the gate, the future remains bright.  

4 thoughts on “The accelerator dilemma

  1. Micah: I couldn’t agree more. We have configured in a way that recognizes these fundamental issues (a) demo day is a dual edged sword (great if your timing and fundraising needs happen to coincide), (b) mentoring is both exhausting (when done properly) and unnatural — true mentorship requires a chemistry between the parties and sustained and valuable contact. That can’t be forced. Also, the proliferation of Accelerators pursuing the same model has led to greater exhaustion among mentors and startups. For these, and other reasons, FirstGrowthVN has remained as follows (a) we don’t charge or take equity, (b) we don’t have a demo day and (c) it is more of a group coming together/community building than mentor pair-up model.
    See more in what was published by WSJ Accelerators here a few days ago:

    • Always refreshing to read a solid investor POV’ed article. I appreciate the comment about the “halo” period. Totally makes sense, after-all who is eager to eat stale meat? Timing truly is everything. Speaking as a first-time entrepreneur there’s so much–or rather there’s nothing you know going into your venture that is not pertaining to your industry of focus. Just as important is the funding process and the long marriage down the road with your investor and the psychology of your “spouse” throughout the marriage.

  2. Pingback: What’s In Your Pitch? | Points and Figures

  3. Great post. We’ve actually considered (and gotten way down the line with) two different accelerators. I think you bring up an excellent point, that I’d love to see addressed in more detail: how to know WHICH accelerator is the right one for you.
    Every accelerator has strengths and weaknesses, just like every startup. It’s a fascinating balancing act to evaluate the “right” accelerator for your company’s stage, strengths, needs, and interests.
    I wonder who will be the one to actually write a detailed, knowledgeable comparison of the various accelerator programs? I have my own thoughts and opinions, but definitely not qualified to write it. I’d sure love to read it, though, and I bet lots of other founders would as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s